MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2914869065 · doi:10.29173/cjfy29430

Book Review of: Chapman, Marina. (2013). The Girl with No Name: The True Story of a Girl Who Lived with Monkeys. Edinburgh: Greystone Books.

2019· article· fr· W2914869065 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kayla Heard

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Family and Youth / Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de la Jeunesse · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGothic Literature and Media Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGirlArtArt historyHistoryPsychologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Girl with No Name," is a compelling and powerful story of a girl that was abducted from her rural Colombian village at the young age of four.She was left all alone in the nature of the jungle with only herself for protection.Overtime she began to adapt to life in the forest and eventually found a new family of monkeys.She soon realized that this place was where she felt most at home.Following the ways of her monkey family she began to adopt their way of life.The girl found herself climbing up trees, sleeping in burrows, and walking on all fours, all the while acclimating to a newfound energetic vigor with which she lived her life.Until one day she was compelled by a mysterious intruder and followed this person out of the forest leaving behind her monkey clan, not knowing what was to lie ahead.A downward spiral of events followed shortly after.She was kept as a servant in a brothel, a mafia house, and a convent.She also eventually became the leader to a gang on the streets of Columbia.Every new situation she found herself in she became part of a new "family" and was given a new name and identity.However, each time she escaped from these horrible places she was stripped of her most recent identity.She was emotionally, physically and mentally abused by the many heartless individuals she met day to day.Marina was treated so horribly because she was seen as an animal instead of a human being.Marina fought the disparities of her life for her sole dream of having children and grandchildren

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.171
Threshold uncertainty score0.572

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1710.138

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Family and Youth / Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de la Jeunesse→Same topicGothic Literature and Media Analysis→French-language works237,207→