MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914880821 · doi:10.4000/books.psorbonne.11195

Quelques remarques sur les serments conservés au Mont-Cassin (xe-xiie siècle)

2010· book-chapter· fr· W2914880821 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-Marie Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueÉditions de la Sorbonne eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L e Registrum Petri Diaconi, grand cartulaire du Mont-Cassin compilé entre 1131 et 1133 – dont je prépare l’édition avec Pierre Chastang, Errico Cuozzo, Laurent Feller, Aurélie Thomas et Matteo Villani–, devait, selon le Prologus rédigé par Pierre Diacre, se clore par une section (la sixième) consacrée aux sacramenta. De fait, bien que les sections ne soient pas individualisées dans le cartulaire et que celui-ci n’ait pas exactement suivi le schéma prévu, les actes nos 615-634, qui couvrent l...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0150.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉditions de la Sorbonne eBooksSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207