MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914883047 · doi:10.1109/taslp.2019.2895241

Differential Kronecker Product Beamforming

2019· article· en· W2914883047 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersIsrael Science Foundation
KeywordsKronecker productDifferential (mechanical device)Kronecker deltaBeamformingComputer scienceProduct (mathematics)Subspace topologyAlgorithmMathematicsPhysicsArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Differential beamformers have attracted much interest over the past few decades. In this paper, we introduce differential Kronecker product beamformers that exploit the structure of the steering vector to perform beamforming differently from the well-known and studied conventional approach. We consider a class of microphone arrays that enable to decompose the steering vector as a Kronecker product of two steering vectors of smaller virtual arrays. In the proposed approach, instead of directly designing the differential beamformer, we break it down following the decomposition of the steering vector, and show how to derive differential beamformers using the Kronecker product formulation. As demonstrated, the Kronecker product decomposition facilitates further flexibility in the design of differential beamformers and in the tradeoff control between the directivity factor and the white noise gain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it