MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914985201 · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2018.8622021

Semi-Supervised Dictionary Learning Based on Atom Graph Regularization

2018· article· en· W2914985201 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and ELM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaplacian matrixComputer scienceGraphOutlierCoordinate descentLaplace operatorArtificial intelligenceRegularization (linguistics)Dictionary learningSemi-supervised learningPattern recognition (psychology)AlgorithmTheoretical computer scienceMachine learningSparse approximationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a novel unified optimization framework for semi-supervised dictionary learning, which optimizes a graph Laplacian component and the dictionary simultaneously. In the framework, the graph Laplacian is defined on the atoms and the corresponding sparse codings. Since the atoms are more concise and representative than the original training samples, the constructed graph Laplacian can not only effectively capture the manifold structure of training samples, but also be more robust to noise and outliers. Moreover, the dictionary and the graph Laplacian can facilitate each other during the learning iterations. We derive an efficient algorithm by combining the block coordinate descent method with the alternating direction method of multipliers to solve the unified optimization problem. Extensive experimental evaluation on several challenging datasets demonstrates the superior performance of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Learning and ELMFrench-language works237,207