MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914985935 · doi:10.1039/c8ra08711c

First-principles calculations of mechanical and thermodynamic properties of tetragonal Be<sub>12</sub>Ti

2019· article· en· W2914985935 on OpenAlexaff
Xiankun Liu, Qijie Feng, Bin Tang, Jian Zheng, Zheng Zhou, Wei Zhou, Jiting Tian, Jing Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueRSC Advances · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicBoron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Association of Emergency Physicians
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBulk modulusPseudopotentialShear modulusThermodynamicsMaterials scienceTetragonal crystal systemElastic modulusThermal expansionHeat capacityCondensed matter physicsLattice constantAnisotropyDebye modelChemistryCrystal structureDiffractionCrystallographyComposite materialPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ti are dealt with in detail under pressure from 0 GPa to 100 GPa. The pressure and temperature dependencies of the relative volume, the bulk modulus, the elastic constants, the heat capacity and the thermal expansion coefficient, as well as the entropy are obtained and discussed using the quasi-harmonic approximation in the ranges of temperature 0-1600 K and pressure 0-100 GPa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRSC AdvancesSame topicBoron and Carbon Nanomaterials ResearchFrench-language works237,207