MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Levinas and Husserl

2018· reference-entry· en· W2915003151 on OpenAlexaff
Bettina Bergo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhenomenology (philosophy)IntentionalitySubjectivityPhilosophyConsciousnessIntuitionEpistemologyEmbodied cognitionCriticismAlterityReinterpretationPsychoanalysisIntersubjectivityPsychologyAestheticsLiteratureArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores Levinas’s complex relationship to Husserlian phenomenology as evinced in four periods marking the former’s intellectual development: 1929–1940, with Levinas exploring Husserl’s conception of “intuition”; 1940–1945, the years when Levinas developed a hermeneutic phenomenology of an embodied subject (“hypostasis”); 1961, with his arguments for a phenomenologically unconstitutable alterity; and 1965−1974, with his first elaborate criticism of Husserl’s “absolute subjectivity” as standing-streaming time consciousness (“Intentionality and Sensation”) and his elaboration of a new phenomenology of passive synthesis and the time of allogenic “affectivity.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.297
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhilosophy, Ethics, and ExistentialismFrench-language works237,207