A local search algorithm for the constrained max cut problem on hypergraphs.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the constrained max k -cut problem on hypergraphs, we are given a weighted hypergraph H=(V, E) , an integer k and a set c of constraints. The goal is to divide the set V of vertices into k disjoint partitions in such a way that the sum of the weights of the hyperedges having at least two endpoints in different partitions is maximized and the partitions satisfy all the constraints in c . In this paper we present a local search algorithm for the constrained max k -cut problem on hypergraphs and show that it has approximation ratio 1-1/k for a variety of constraints c , such as for the constraints defining the max Steiner k -cut problem, the max multiway cut problem and the max k -cut problem. We also show that our local search algorithm can be used on the max k -cut problem with given sizes of parts and on the capacitated max k -cut problem, and has approximation ratio 1-|V max |/|V| , where |V max | is the cardinality of the biggest partition. In addition, we present a local search algorithm for the directed max k -cut problem that has approximation ratio (k-1)/(3k-2).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".