La disponibilité universelle des publications : un nouveau programme de coopération internationale prolongeant le Contrôle bibliographique universel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La Fédération internationale des associations de bibliothécaires et des bibliothèques (IFLA) vient d’adopter un programme de Disponibilité universelle des publications (UAP). L’UAP prolonge tout en l’enrichissant le Contrôle bibliographique universel (CBU), puisqu’il place la notion de l’utilisateur au coeur même de l’élaboration du système envisagé. L’article présente le concept et résume cette nouvelle initiative de l’IFLA. Toutes les divisions de la Fédération travaillent à la réalisation de ce programme qui vise à rendre les publications du monde entier accessibles à tous, grâce surtout à de vastes collections et à un réseau de prêt universel. Ce programme ne pourra se réaliser qu’avec la coopération de l’ensemble des bibliothèques de tous les pays.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.043 | 0.055 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.035 | 0.023 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".