Análisis comparativo de tres redes agroalimentarias alternativas en México y Canadá
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines the case of three alternative agri-food networks which are considered alternative mechanisms of purchase and sale of agri-food products, namely the Organic Tianguis of Chapingo in the State of Mexico in Mexico; the grassroots organization Zacahuitzco, in Mexico City, and the farmers markets of the metropolitan area of Vancouver, Canada. The main objective of this study is to recognize, from the perspective of the Conventions theory and the Alternative Rationalities approach, the parallelism, as well as and the differences of this networks in their own unique contexts, in order to deepen conceptualization and theorization on the issue of constructing alternatives in the contemporary agri-food field. The main findings of this research are contradictory: some progresses related to the reconstruction of alternative relationships between small producers and consumers were identified. However, the commercial aspects of the exchange process have become more and more significant, undermining the core values that motivated the emergence of these networks in the first place.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it