Inventaire des catalogues de 1852, 1857 et 1870 de la bibliothèque de l’Institut canadien de Montréal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’Institut canadien de Montréal fut sans contredit le centre intellectuel le plus prestigieux du Québec au XIXe siècle. En plus d’organiser des conférences et des réunions littéraires, il mit à la disposition de ses membres une bibliothèque qui se voulait accessible à toutes les classes de la société. Pourtant, après l’analyse des catalogues de 1852, 1857 et 1870, on constate que la collection s’adressait plutôt aux membres des professions libérales, les oeuvres politiques et littéraires l’emportant nettement par le nombre sur les ouvrages traitant du commerce et des métiers. Cet inventaire de catalogues fournit de nombreuses indications sur les méthodes de classement et de repérage pratiquées dans les bibliothèques québécoises au XIXe siècle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.076 | 0.113 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".