Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-Dose Therapy for High-Risk, Aggressive Lymphoma The role of autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) as consolidation treatment for higher-risk, aggressive B- and T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) remains controversial. In the phase III, randomized, SWOG S9704 trial, U.S. and Canadian researchers compared the use of 8 cycles of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) with or without rituximab versus CHOP for 6 cycles followed by ASCT in patients who achieved partial or complete remission after 5 cycles. Eligible patients were aged <65 with B- or T-cell diffuse aggressive NHL and high-intermediate or high-risk, age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores. Patients with high-intermediate IPI scores experienced no difference with ASCT versus chemotherapy only in terms of 2-year progression-free survival (PFS; 66% vs. 63%) or overall survival (OS; 70% vs. 75%), whereas those with high-risk IPI …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".