MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2915476391 · doi:10.3938/jkps.74.328

Radio Frequency Processing of Radio Frequency Power Coupler for Quarter Wave Resonator in Rare Isotope Science Project

2019· article· en· W2915476391 on OpenAlex
Sangbeen Lee, Junwoo Lee, Bong‐Hyuk Choi, Yoochul Jung

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Korean Physical Society · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute for Basic Science
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)ResonatorRadio frequencyPower (physics)PhysicsAcousticsMaterials scienceTelecommunicationsComputer scienceOpticsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radio frequency (RF) power couplers for quarter wave resonators (QWR) have been developed for rare isotope science project (RISP) in Daejeon Korea. The power coupler is required to deliver up to 2 kW RF power at 81.25 MHz to the QWR cavity in continuous-wave (CW) mode. The prototype of QWR RF power couplers are fabricated and tested. The coupler test bench has been developed in order to conduct RF processing. The RF processing consists of two section, pulse mode and CW mode. The multipaction (MP) band of the QWR coupler has been measured during RF processing. After the RF processing, the RF test has been performed keeping 2.0 kW RF power during 8 hours. As the results of the RF test, the prototype of couplers for QWR has been qualified to assemble with the cavity for cryomodule test.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it