Antimicrobial spectrum activity of bacteriocinogenic Staphylococcus strains isolated from goat and sheep milk
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bacteriocins have attracted great attention as potential alternatives to antibiotics and chemical food additives. In the present study, 243 Staphylococcus isolates from milk samples (n = 110) of goat and sheep herds located in Fars province, Iran, were screened for antimicrobial substance production. Twenty-eight isolates showed an antagonistic activity against the indicator strain Micrococcus luteus ATCC 4698. The susceptibility of all antimicrobial substances to proteolytic enzymes allowed us to consider them as bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances (BLIS). The term BLIS is applied to uncharacterized proteinaceous antimicrobials produced by gram-positive bacteria. Based on molecular identification methods, the isolates belonged to the species Staphylococcus chromogenes, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus agnetis. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis revealed a high level of genotype diversity among the Staph. chromogenes isolates. All of the isolates harbored nukA or bsaA2 genes, suggesting that their BLIS were related to nukacin or Bsa. The antimicrobial compounds from test strains were not effective against gram-negative pathogens, including Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Klebsiella pneumonia as well as the indicator mold Aspergillus fumigatus. All the gram-positive targets, including Bacillus cereus, Listeria monocytogenes, Enterococcus faecalis Ef37 (a tyramine-producer strain), Lactobacillus saerimneri 30a (a histamine-producer strain), and methicillin-resistant Staph. epidermidis, were inhibited by the Staph. chromogenes isolates. Staphylococcus haemolyticus 4S12 was able to inhibit the majority of gram-positive bacteria. Listeria monocytogenes strains were the only indicators sensitive to the antimicrobial agents produced by Staph. agnetis 4S97B. The other Staphylococcus strains were ineffective on all the organisms tested. Based on their inhibitory capacities, the BLIS produced by the Staph. chromogenes isolates seem to be interesting candidates for developing novel antimicrobial agents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".