Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoates Copolymers by Recombinant <b><i>Pseudomonas</i></b> in Plasmid- and Antibiotic-Free Cultures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three different polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) synthase genes (Ralstonia eutropha H16, Aeromonas sp. TSM81 or Aeromonas hydrophila ATCC7966 phaC) were introduced into the chromosome of two Pseudomonas strains: a native medium-chain-length 3-polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHAMCL) producer (Pseudomonas sp. LFM046) and a UV-induced mutant strain unable to produce PHA (Pseudomonas sp. LFM461). We reported for the first time the insertion of a chromosomal copy of phaC using the transposon system mini-Tn7. Stable antibiotic marker-free and plasmid-free recombinants were obtained. Subsequently, P(3HB-co-3HAMCL) was produced by these recombinants using glucose as the sole carbon source, without the need for co-substrates and under antibiotic-free conditions. A recombinant harboring A. hydrophila phaC produced a terpolyester composed of 84.2 mol% of 3-hydroxybutyrate, 6.3 mol% of 3-hydroxyhexanoate, and 9.5 mol% of 3-hydroxydecanoate from only glucose. Hence, we were successful in increasing the industrial potential of Pseudomonas sp. LFM461 strain by producing PHA copolymers containing 3HB and 3HAMCL using an unrelated carbon source, for the first time in a plasmid- and antibiotic-free bioprocess.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".