MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2915581683 · doi:10.1002/047084289x.rn01939

<i>N</i>-[(Dimethylamino)[(2-oxo-1(2<i>H</i>)-pyridinyl)oxy]methylene]-<i>N</i>-methylmethanaminium tetrafluoroborate

2016· reference-entry· en· W2915581683 on OpenAlexaff
Jordan D. Goodreid, Robert A. Batey

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis · 2016
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChemical Synthesis and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReagentTetrafluoroborateChemistryOxidizing agentEpimerMethyleneRegioselectivityMedicinal chemistryYield (engineering)Organic chemistryIonic liquidCatalysisMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[125700-71-2] C10H16BF4N3O2 (MW 297.06) InChI = InChI=1S/C10H16N3O2.BF4/c1-11(2)10(12(3)4)15-13-8-6-5-7-9(13)14;2-1(3,4)5/h5-8H,1-4H3;/q+1;-1 InChIKey = CZQGINAUZYECAI-UHFFFAOYSA-N InChI = 1S/C10H16N3O2/c1-11(2)10(12(3)4)15-13-8-6-5-7-9(13)14/h5-8H,1-4H3/q+1 InChI Key = VPMAWWKDEFLLBU-UHFFFAOYSA-N (peptide coupling reagent providing high yield and low epimerization levels5; promotes lactamization of cyclic peptides6; regioselective amidation9a) Alternate Names: TPTU, O-(2-oxo-1(2H)pyridyl)- N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyluronium tetrafluoroborate. Physical Data: mp 140 °C (dec.). Solubility: soluble in CH2Cl2, DMF, DMSO, NMP, and CH3CN. Form Supplied in: white solid; widely available. Analysis of Reagent Purity: 1H NMR and HPLC. Handling, Storage, and Precautions: reagent should be kept refrigerated (≤8 °C) for long-term storage. Light-sensitive. Incompatibility: strong oxidizing agents. Avoid breathing dust and vapors; avoid contact with eyes and skin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of Reagents for Organic SynthesisSame topicChemical Synthesis and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207