Very Short-Term Wind Power Prediction Interval Framework via Bi-Level Optimization and Novel Convex Cost Function
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Substantial challenges in power systems operation and control as a result of the intermittent and stochastic nature of wind power generation can be significantly alleviated by proficient very short-term wind power prediction interval (WPPI) models. In WPPI models, minimization of cost functions is conducted to train prediction engines and consequently tune their parameters. The prevalent cost functions of prediction engines in WPPI models are mainly non-differentiable and non-convex, and therefore the training process becomes problematic. To transcend such a crucial barrier, this paper addresses a new very short-term WPPI framework based on a bi-level formulation and benefiting from a differentiable and convex cost function. The prediction engine is trained by classical global optimization of the cost function in the lower-level problem, while hyperparameters that control the quality of the WPPIs are injected thereto from the upper-level problem. The hyperparameters can be tuned such that the most useful WPPIs are constructed from the lower-level problem depending on the power system operator's preferences. Lessening the need to heuristically tune a large number of prediction engine parameters is the foremost contribution of this work to the WPPI literature. The superior performance of the proposed WPPI is verified in the multistep ahead prediction of real wind power generation data in comparison to well-tailored benchmark models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it