MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2915631877

Психовегетативные методы диагностики в практике судебной психиатрии

2018· article· ru· W2915631877 on OpenAlexaff
Максим Юрьевич Каменсков, Лиза Мэрфи, Дарина Михайловна Купцова

Bibliographic record

VenueРоссийский психиатрический журнал · 2018
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolygraphPsychologyParaphiliaReliability (semiconductor)Affect (linguistics)Applied psychologySocial psychologySexual behaviorCommunication
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article presents an information-analytical review for the purpose of introducing the psychophysiological approaches to assessment of disorders of sexual preference with the use of penile plethysmography and the polygraph. It briefly explores the historical aspects of the use of psychophysiological methods in criminological and sexological practice. The necessity for their use in the forensic psychiatric examinations is substantiated. The methodological support for both methods has been described in detail. The article focuses on the problems, which generally affect the validity and reliability of penile plethysmography and the polygraph.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.036

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueРоссийский психиатрический журналSame topicHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseFrench-language works237,207