What is the optimal timing of embryo transfer when there are only one or two embryos at cleavage stage?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Today, most IVF programs have moved to blastocyst transfer but there is still uncertainty regarding when to transfer if there are only one or two embryos at the cleavage stage. The aim of this study was to compare the pregnancy rate of day 3 transfers vs. blastocyst stage transfers in patients who had only one or two embryos on day 3. We conducted a retrospective study of 102 patients with one or two cleavage stage embryos that had their embryos transferred on day 3 and 429 patients had their embryos cultured to day 5 for transfer. The number of mature oocytes (4.0 vs 4.6, p = NS) and number of cleavage stage embryos on day 3 was similar in the two groups (1.3 vs. 1.5, p = NS). The clinical pregnancy rate per retrieval (22% vs. 24.6%, p= NS) and the ongoing pregnancy rate per retrieval (20% vs. 20.2%, p = NS) was comparable between the groups. Fifty seven (13.2%) of the patients had cleavage embryo arrest and did not have an embryo to transfer on day 5. We conclude that the cumulative pregnancy rate is the same for patients with 1–2 cleavage stage embryos regardless of whether the embryo is transferred on day 3 or day 5.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".