MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2915646365

Analysis of power grids security in 2003

2004· article· en· W2915646365 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectric Power · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid and Power Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectric power systemElectric powerNational powerPower (physics)Electric power industryReliability engineeringAction (physics)EngineeringBusinessComputer scienceElectrical engineeringElectricityPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2003, with the great increase of the national economy, electric power is demanded so much that the power is limited in 22 provinces or cities. Especially in summer, the loads of some power grids have been the largest in recent years and equipments are burdened with heavy load widely. Serious failures of power cut having occurred in America, Canada, Britain, Italy and so on in succession, the reformation of the national power system going on. different beneficiaries being in electric power industry, laws and criterions for restricting them being established and perfected, the grids security is paid attention to in society. According to the statistics of failures in 2003, the paper analyzes the cause and effect of the failures, and summarizes their characteristics, which can be regarded by the departments, to learn the lessons, take action, improve the electric seculity management level and make the grids stronger.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.274
Threshold uncertainty score0.568

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it