MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2915673960 · doi:10.1093/jac/dkz064

Report of a KPC-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate in Canada

2019· letter· en· W2915673960 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andrew Walkty, David C. Alexander, James A. Karlowsky, Kim Nichol, John M. Embil

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2019
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsManitoba HealthUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPseudomonas aeruginosaMicrobiologyBiologyBacteriaGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sir, Enterobacteriaceae producing a KPC enzyme have been recovered in Canada, but to date KPC enzymes have not been documented among Pseudomonas aeruginosa in this country. This report briefly describes a patient in Canada colonized with a KPC-producing P. aeruginosa isolate. An elderly man with a history of hospital treatment in India was referred to a university-affiliated outpatient infectious diseases clinic (Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada) for assessment regarding recurrent urinary tract infections. The patient previously had placement of a suprapubic Foley catheter in India to manage urinary obstruction. He had been living in Canada for a year prior to presentation. At the time he was evaluated in the infectious diseases clinic, he complained of restlessness and blood clots in his catheter, but was otherwise asymptomatic. A urine sample obtained through the suprapubic catheter was sent to the hospital’s clinical microbiology laboratory for culture. No antimicrobial treatment was provided as the patient did not have clear symptoms or signs consistent with urinary tract infection. A P. aeruginosa isolate was recovered on culture at a concentration of >1 × 105 cfu/mL using chromogenic medium (BBLTM CHROMagarTM Orientation; Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD, USA). The isolate was identified with MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker MALDI Biotyper System, RUO MBT Compass 4.1.70; Bruker Daltonics Ltd, East Milton, Ontario, Canada). Susceptibility testing was performed with a VitekTM 2 AST-N208 card (bioMérieux, St Laurent, Quebec, Canada), with MICs interpreted according to current CLSI breakpoints.1 The isolate demonstrated phenotypic resistance to ceftazidime, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin and ciprofloxacin. Meropenem resistance was confirmed by broth microdilution following the method described by CLSI.2 On supplemental testing (broth microdilution), the isolate was resistant to ceftolozane/tazobactam, but remained susceptible to colistin. Carbapenemase production was demonstrated phenotypically using a commercial colorimetric assay (the Neo-Rapid CARB Screen kit; Rosco Diagnostica, Taastrup, Denmark). The isolate was forwarded on to a provincial public health reference laboratory (Cadham Provincial Laboratory, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada) for carbapenemase gene detection by WGS on the MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The P. aeruginosa genome was assembled using the Integrated Rapid Infectious Diseases Analysis pipeline (www.irida.ca/) and the contigs analysed for antimicrobial resistance alleles by ResFinder on the Center for Genomic Epidemiology website (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/). The isolate was found to harbour the KPC-2 gene. Sequencing data associated with this isolate have been deposited in NCBI. KPC enzymes are a group of Ambler molecular class A serine carbapenemases.3 The first KPC gene was reported in a K. pneumoniae isolate from North Carolina (USA) in 1996.3 To date, there have been 23 different KPC enzymes described in the literature (KPC-2–24).4 KPC enzymes have been most frequently reported among members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, but they have also been described in several non-Enterobacteriaceae species.3,5 The first report of a KPC-producing P. aeruginosa was from Columbia in 2006.6 KPC-producing P. aeruginosa isolates have subsequently been described in Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Iran, Mexico City, Germany, Trinidad and Tobago, and the USA.4,7–15 In Canada, carbapenemase production among P. aeruginosa remains uncommon. Sporadic reports have described recovery of P. aeruginosa isolates harbouring a VIM or IMP enzyme.16 More recently, McCracken et al.17 systematically evaluated 382 meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa clinical isolates for carbapenemase production. The isolates were obtained from patients seeking care at hospitals across Canada between 2007 and 2016 as part of the CANWARD study. Only 13 isolates were found to contain a carbapenemase gene. The specific genes detected were GES-5, VIM-2, VIM-4, IMP-18 and IMP-7.17 None of the isolates was found to harbour a KPC enzyme. It is thought that the KPC-producing isolate in the patient described here was likely acquired during a hospital stay in India, prior to his arrival in Canada. In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, we present the first case of a KPC-producing P. aeruginosa clinical isolate in Canada. The finding of a KPC enzyme in P. aeruginosa is concerning, as there are already limited antimicrobial options for treating infections caused by this pathogen. This case highlights the risk for global spread of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria related to patient movement between countries. Ongoing surveillance in Canada for carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa is required to ensure these isolates are not increasing in frequency. This study was supported by internal funding. None to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score0.894

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0120.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapySame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207