MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2915736430 · doi:10.1111/jch.13500

Volcanic smog and cardiometabolic health: Hawaiian hypertension?

2019· article· en· W2915736430 on OpenAlexaff
Robert D. Brook, J. R. Brook, Elizabeth Tam

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Hypertension · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVolcanoLavaMedicineVulcanian eruptionVolcanic GasesEarth scienceGeochemistryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The eruption during May 2018 of the Kīlauea volcano in Hawaiʹi drew international attention to this spectacular force of nature. Modern technology allowed the global public to marvel at the awe-inspiring grandeur of volcanos from the safety of their own homes. However, Kīlauea also has a dark side. The current Lower Puna eruption, from dozens of fissures along the eastern rift zone, may be the most destructive volcanic event in the United States since the 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens. Over 700 homes and other properties were destroyed, roadways covered by lava and unique coastal features (eg, freshwater ponds) irrevocably spoiled. While only a handful of direct injuries from lava were reported, thousands of residents were forced to evacuate surrounding areas due to noxious levels of sulfur dioxide (SO2). Moreover, as we will discuss in greater detail in later sections of this article, volcanos may also pose significant cardiometabolic health risks to the surrounding populations. We posit here that exposure to particulate air pollution derived from eruptions—volcanic smog (vog)—may contribute to high blood pressure (BP) and possibly to the development of the metabolic syndrome. Kīlauea is one of the most active volcanos in the world and has been continuously erupting since 1982. Typically, 500-14 000 metric tons of SO2 are vented daily (https://vog.ivhhn.org/).1 The renewed eruption during 2018 substantially increased gaseous emissions which are capable of imparting serious health effects including mucosal irritation (eg, conjunctiva, nasopharynx), coughing, and the exacerbation of asthma.1 Fortunately, hazardous SO2 levels are typically limited to relatively nearby areas. Conversely, what is not widely appreciated (apart from most residents and some visitors to Hawaiʹi) is the markedly greater geographic scale and magnitude of the ensuing production of vog. Vog is an air pollution mixture composed chiefly of secondarily generated acidic aerosols in the fine particulate matter <2.5 µm (PM2.5) size range and comprised largely of sulfate species (eg, sulfuric acid). It is formed over hours-to-days when SO2 reacts in the presence of sunlight with oxygen, water vapor, and other gases in the atmosphere. Given the incessant activity of Kīlauea, there is often a background concentration of PM2.5 covering southwest Hawaiʹi Island due to meteorological and topographical conditions.1 Not surprisingly, however, PM2.5 levels increased dramatically and habitually blanketed much larger regions across Hawai'i Island during the spring and summer of 2018. The increase in vog can even impact other nearby more heavily populated islands (Maui, Oahu) depending upon prevailing wind conditions. What is visible to everyone is an undulating gray haze often more intense later in the afternoon due to landward sea-breezes. The miasma can become so severe as to obscure the normally stunning panorama (Figure 1). While vog is known to adversely influence the local economy, the less obvious potential consequences to public health should be of equal or even greater concern. During 2018 daily PM2.5 levels increased 3- to 10-fold above usual in parts of Hawaiʹi—ranging from 20 to 80 µg/m3. In many locations, they routinely exceeded World Health Organization (WHO) Air Quality Guidelines (AQG) (<20 µg/m3). The Air Quality Index even surpassed 150 on several occasions—a value deemed “unhealthy” even for people without pre-existing medical conditions (https://www.airnow.gov/). This magnitude of air pollution is a problem more typical for developing countries (eg, China and India), not a tropical paradise. What is perhaps most shocking; however, is that the public health ramifications for the more than 180 000 residents and 1.8 million visitors to Hawaiʹi Island arriving each year from every corner of the world are less clear than the air itself. While several studies link vog to a worsening of respiratory ailments (eg, asthma exacerbations) (https://vog.ivhhn.org/),1 the wealth of research demonstrating numerous extra-pulmonary health effects from exposure to a similar air pollutant, anthropogenic PM2.5, should raise even greater concerns. PM2.5 derived from fossil fuel combustion is the fifth leading risk factor for global mortality. Yet, what is often unappreciated is that cardiovascular diseases account for the majority (>60%) of PM2.5-related deaths.2 Short-term exposures trigger myocardial infarctions, strokes, arrhythmias, heart failure, and cardiovascular mortailty.3 A 10 µg/m3 elevation in PM2.5 over a few days promotes a 1%-2% increase in these events. Living in persistently polluted locations over the long-term further amplifies these risks up to 10% per year.3 This increase in morbidity and mortality occurs even when PM2.5 levels are within WHO AQG. As such, both the American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology have deemed PM2.5 as a causal risk factor for global cardiovascular diseases.3, 4 In addition, we and others have shown that PM2.5 air pollution potentiates the development of cardiometabolic conditions—high BP, diabetes mellitus (DM), and atherosclerosis.3-16 Short-term exposures over a few hours to days significantly increase BP by several mechanisms. The pro-hypertensive response, typified by an increase in BP by 1-10 mm Hg depending upon individual susceptibility and PM2.5 concentrations, is not limited to extremely high PM2.5 levels but occurs even within daily WHO AQG (<20 µg/m3).8-11 Importantly, the elevation in BP has been shown to persist indefinitely—so long as air pollution levels remain high. Animal experiments add further mechanistic support that chronic exposures can promote long-lasting BP elevations.4, 7 As such, mounting evidence supports that PM2.5 is a risk factor of global importance for the development of hypertension.3, 6, 8-11 Moreover, there is a growing scientific literature that insulin resistance and DM are also provoked by air pollutants.12, 13 Given the many linkages between man-made PM2.5 and cardiometabolic disorders, the following question thus arises: what about vog? Do particles comprised largely of sulfuric acid but less enriched in other toxic components (eg, metals, combustion-related organic species)1 present similar cardiometabolic risks? If we consider all fine particles regardless of their chemistry potentially harmful on a concentration (per mass/cubic meter) basis, in accordance with contemporary scientific practice,2, 3 then there should indeed be a commensurate increase in BP, insulin resistance, and cardiovascular events among those living or visiting the Hawaiian Islands who are exposed to vog. In support of this supposition, numerous studies have shown that the inhalation of aerosol particles regardless of source (rural and urban), size range (fine and coarse), and composition are capable of raising BP.3, 8 Many environmental factors are known to increase BP,16 should vog be added to this growing list (eg, “Hawaiian hypertension”).11 If so, what is the total public health toll after accounting for these putative cardiometabolic effects given the dramatic increase in vog throughout 2018? What can (or should) the public do to protect themselves (eg, use indoor air filters or N95 respirators) during periods of heavy vog considering our current state of incomplete knowledge? How should healthcare providers advise patients who live in or wish to visit regions impacted by vog? Should individuals with hypertension and/or DM be concerned about vog worsening control of their BP and blood glucose? These are just some of the many questions that, like the air itself in Hawaiʹi, await to be fully clarified. Here, we aim to raise awareness among the scientific and medical communities about vog as an issue not just of importance for Hawaiʹi, but for the world. Roughly, 5%-10% of the global population is impacted by a nearby volcano (tps://vog.ivhhn.org/). We further aim to draw attention to the urgent need for research to help inform public health and medical policies. Unlike anthropogenic PM2.5, surprisingly little is known about the health effects of vog,1 particularly in relation to cardiometabolic illnesses. What little data are available are mixed but suggest, like man-made air pollution, an association with increases in BP.17, 18 Obviously, there is no effective way to regulate volcanic emissions to improve air quality, but studies can inform and encourage behavioral changes, public education, and policies to reduce exposure to air pollution of all sources. The most recent eruption of Kīlauea should serve as a wake-up call to jump-start cross-disciplinary research aiming to better understand the full health consequences of vog as well as to garner an evidence-base to guide rational public policy and individual-level strategies (eg, air filters) to help protect the millions of people living in and visiting areas impacted by vog.19 In closing, the public health issues surrounding vog will not vanish like a puff of smoke even after the most recent Kīlauea eruption completely abates. There are potential lingering effects in the population and there are always gaseous emissions resulting in low-to-moderate levels of PM2.5 across Hawaiʹi. Taking another lesson from anthropogenic air pollution, even low PM2.5 levels within annual AQG (<12 µg/m3) increase the risks for morbidity and mortality.3, 4 The enduring risks from vog are therefore of special concern for the resident Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders, at-risk populations who disproportionately suffer from cardiometabolic risk factors such as obesity and DM (https://sites.ed.gov/aapi/data-and-statistics/) and who will face exposures in perpetuity. We believe much more effort is needed to elucidate the full extent of the potential health problems posed by vog. Environmental justice demands we focus greater attention on understanding and mitigating the adverse public health consequences. The authors report no conflict of interest to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score0.596

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical HypertensionSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207