MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2915746104 · doi:10.3138/jmvfh.2018-0005

Brain Bootcamp: Pre–post comparison findings of an integrated behavioural health intervention for military members with reduced executive cognitive functioning

2019· article· en· W2915746104 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Chelsea Jones, Ashley Pike, Suzette Brémault‐Phillips

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Military Veteran and Family Health · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Armed ForcesUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Armed Forces
KeywordsMedicineIntervention (counseling)Traumatic brain injuryPsychosocialCognitionAcquired brain injuryConcussionRehabilitationPsychiatryPoison controlClinical psychologyInjury preventionPhysical therapyMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) Service members (SMs) experience higher rates of mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) and psychosocial risk factors such as mental health diagnoses, sleep disturbances, alcohol consumption, and post-concussion symptoms than Canadian civilians. Associated challenges with executive cognitive functioning (ECF) can significantly impede their performance, engagement, and deployability. To address challenges with ECF, an occupational therapist providing rehabilitation services to CAF SMs created and delivered Brain Bootcamp – an integrated behavioural health intervention for CAF SMs who sustained an mTBI or more serious traumatic brain injury (TBI) and had reduced ECF. Although anecdotal post-intervention feedback is favourable, Brain Bootcamp’s impact on ECF in individuals with mTBI or TBI, mental health diagnoses, or both has yet to be determined. This study aimed to determine whether Brain Bootcamp improves cognitive performance, reduces mTBI- and TBI-related symptoms, and increases external aid utilization among CAF SMs with reduced ECF. Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental study of clinical outcomes collected from 55 participants who participated in Brain Bootcamp. Measures used to determine changes in client ECF before and after the intervention included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptom Questionnaire, and External Aids Utilization Survey. Results: Statistically significant changes pre- and post-intervention were observed, including improved cognitive performance, reduced self-reported mTBI or TBI symptoms, and increased external aid utilization. Discussion: Brain Bootcamp may have a positive effect on ECF. Such improvements can enable CAF SMs to be operationally ready for military service and have greater overall well-being. Brain Bootcamp appears to be a promising ECF-enhancing intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Military Veteran and Family HealthSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207