Peningkatan Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Kelistrikan Otomotif Menggunakan Alat Peraga Sistem Pengapian Konvensional Pada SMK 45 Kota Bima
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa dengan menggunakan alat peraga sistem pengapian konvensional. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah eksperiment, dengan populasi siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan 45 Kota Bima jurusan teknik mesin yang terdiri dari 36 siswa. hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa ada peningkatan hasil belajar kelistrikan otomotif dengan menggunakan alat peraga sistem pengapian konvensional. dengan nilai rata-rata (pre-test) sebesar 56,11 dan nilai rata-rata setelah menerapkan pembelajaran menggunakan alat peraga sistem pengapian (post-test) sebesar 73,33. sehingga terjadi peningkatan 30,68% dapat dikatakan bahwa penggunaan alat peraga sistem pengapian konvensional pada matapelajaran kelistrikan otomotif telah berjalan dengan baik setelah menggunakan alat peraga sistem pengapian. Hal ini memberikan bukti bahwa ada peningkatan (taraf signifikan 5%) hasil belajar Kelistrikan Otomotif dengan menggunakan alat peraga sistem pengapian konvensional pada siswa SMK 45 Kota Bima Jurusan Tekhnik Mesin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".