MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2915791461 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2018.8647731

A Fast Vehicular Traffic Flow Prediction Scheme Based on Fourier and Wavelet Analysis

2018· article· en· W2915791461 on OpenAlexaff
Peng Sun, Noura Aljeri, Azzedine Boukerche

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraffic flow (computer networking)Fast Fourier transformComputer scienceTraffic congestionWaveletIntelligent transportation systemWavelet transformNoise (video)Real-time computingDiscrete wavelet transformTraffic congestion reconstruction with Kerner's three-phase theoryTransport engineeringSimulationEngineeringAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Currently, traffic congestion has become a part of daily life of people in the cities around the world, and impacts people's lives adversely, e.g., the extra time spent on commuting, the extra exhaust emissions, etc. In order to reduce the effects of congestion on our lives, intensive research efforts have been proposed on this issue. Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) is one of potential solutions to enable various applications to improve road safety and travel comfort, and has gained a lot of attention from researchers around the world. In order to efficiently manage the transportation system and reduce traffic congestion, one of the paramount problems needed to be solved in ITS is the accurate traffic prediction. In this article, we firstly combine Fourier analysis with wavelet denoising technique to cope with the traffic flow forecasting problem. A two-layer fast Fourier transform (FFT)-based traffic prediction scenario is proposed, in which the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) with two different threshold values are adopted to decompose the high-frequent-noise and identify low-frequent traffic flow changing trend from the original data. Three different data sets with different traffic flow patterns are chosen from the England Highways data set to test our proposed work. Intensive simulations are implemented to verify the proposed work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207