Using <i>For Colored Girls</i> as a Creative Way to Help Me Understand How Empathic I Am
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The author of this mixed-method research study explored the use of the movie, For Colored Girls, as a creative way to promote and understand how empathy emerged among 20 masters-level counseling psychology trainees. The trainees viewed two video monologues from the movie For Colored Girls (Perry, 2010) and then completed the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) (as a pre-and posttest measure and empathy self-rating scale), the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), and several open-ended questions and outcome questions. The findings revealed a statistically significant difference between TEQ pre-and posttest measures and a statistically significant positive correlation between self-rating empathy levels on the IRI subscales. Several themes emerged, and the value of using featured films as a creative activity are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it