MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2915901518 · doi:10.1049/iet-com.2018.5203

Evaluation of outage probability for uniformly distributed users based on signal‐to‐interference‐plus‐noise ratio

2019· article· en· W2915901518 on OpenAlexaff
Sami Baroudi, Yousef R. Shayan

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Communications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSignal-to-interference-plus-noise ratioComputer scienceInterference (communication)Wireless networkWirelessSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Probability density functionStochastic geometryBase stationSignal-to-interference ratioNoise (video)Coverage probabilityStochastic geometry models of wireless networksTelecommunicationsComputer networkStatisticsRadio resource managementMathematicsPower (physics)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Improving the performance of wireless networks to maintain good quality of service for all users is always an ultimate goal. To reach this goal, the performance should be evaluated accurately and then analysed. Geometric modelling of wireless networks is drawing significant attention with regard to analytically evaluating the performance. In this study, stochastic modelling of users is used to emulate their distribution in wireless networks, which is analysed when only one direct link is connecting the base station to each user over the cell. Hence, the final findings will be more universal and applicable for different types of mobile cellular networks. Probability density function (PDF) of signal‐to‐interference ratio, and signal‐to‐noise ratio are evaluated, and used to find the PDF of signal‐to‐interference‐plus‐noise ratio (SINR) in a uniform filed of interference. Then, the outage probability based on SINR is evaluated, since it is one of the important factors in studying the performance of wireless networks. Finally, simulations are performed in order to validate the analytical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.591

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207