La bibliophilie québécoise à la fin du XIXe siècle : l’exemple de Philéas Gagnon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Faste période pour la bibliophilie au Québec, le dernier quart du XIXe siècle fut surtout marqué par la contribution originale du Québécois Philéas Gagnon. Celui-ci, par sa détermination et son organisation, a su, avec des moyens limités, élaborer et structurer un réseau d’acquisitions dont les principaux rouages furent : les ventes aux enchères, le dépouillement et l’émission de catalogues de vente, la publication d’un catalogue raisonné de sa bibliothèque et, bien sûr, les habituels processus d’échanges et de dons. Les ramifications multiples, tant canadiennes qu’étrangères, des divers canaux d’approvisionnement de ce bibliophile surprennent d’autant plus qu’il ne s’agissait pour lui que d’un loisir. Cette oeuvre individuelle de rassemblement et de mise en valeur du patrimoine en imprimés québécois suscite encore aujourd’hui l’admiration, tant par son envergure que par sa gratuité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".