MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2915941101 · doi:10.1155/2019/9691507

Optimization of Energy Recovery Efficiency for Parallel Hydraulic Hybrid Power Systems Based on Dynamic Programming

2019· article· en· W2915941101 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Problems in Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDynamic programmingTorqueTest benchPower (physics)Computer scienceTransmission (telecommunications)Displacement (psychology)Hydraulic machineryEnergy (signal processing)Automotive engineeringSimulationControl theory (sociology)EngineeringAlgorithmMechanical engineeringMathematicsEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an optimization algorithm of energy recovery efficiency is proposed for parallel hydraulic hybrid systems (PHHS) using dynamic programming (DP). Global optimal solution of pump displacement and transmission ratio under the known urban drive cycles is obtained by using the DP approach, where the total amount of energy recovery is defined as the cost function, and the pump displacement and the transmission ratio of the torque coupler are defined as the deciding variables. Two major steps are involved in verifying the proposed approach. Firstly, a PHHS Simulink model is accurately obtained by repeated comparison with the bench test. Subsequently, we derive a parallel hydraulic hybrid vehicle (PHHV) from adding a hydraulic hybrid system to an electric vehicle in ADVISOR (advanced vehicle simulator). This vehicle is used to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method in energy recovery efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it