Dix ans de coopération entre les bibliothèques universitaires du Québec : un bilan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’année 1977 marque le dixième anniversaire de la création du Sous-comité des bibliothèques de la Conférence des recteurs et des principaux des universités du Québec. Celui-ci a joué, dans les milieux universitaires et même au sein de la collectivité des bibliothèques québécoises, un rôle unique. Il a été l’un des premiers organismes de coopération volontaire à amorcer, et surtout à planifier, une mise en commun de ses ressources au bénéfice de l’ensemble de ses membres et de leurs usagers. L’auteur dresse un rapide bilan des activités du Sous-comité et esquisse quelques-uns de ses projets, après avoir situé, dans le contexte plus large de l’ensemble des activités de coopération des universités elles-mêmes, celles dont le Sous-comité des bibliothèques a été l’instigateur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.028 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".