MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2916061209 · doi:10.1016/j.nephro.2019.01.001

Reprint of: Burden, access, and disparities in kidney disease

2019· editorial· en· W2916061209 on OpenAlexaff
Deidra C. Crews, Aminu K. Bello, Gamal Saadi, Philip Kam‐Tao Li, Guillermo García-García, Sharon Andreoli, Kamyar Kalantar‐Zadeh, Charles Kernahan, Latha Kumaraswami, Luisa Strani

Bibliographic record

VenueNéphrologie & Thérapeutique · 2019
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReprintMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Author(s): Crews, Deidra C; Bello, Aminu K; Saadi, Gamal; Committee, World Kidney Day Steering; Li, Philip Kam Tao; Garcia-Garcia, Guillermo; Andreoli, Sharon; Crews, Deidra; Kalantar-Zadeh, Kamyar; Kernahan, Charles; Kumaraswami, Latha; Saadi, Gamal; Strani, Luisa

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1770.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNéphrologie & ThérapeutiqueSame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207