Reprint of: Burden, access, and disparities in kidney disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'altération de la qualité de vie perçue par les patients traités en hémodialyse chronique résulte de nombreux facteurs, parmi lesquels l'environnement de soins. La réglementation en vigueur a sensiblement amélioré les conditions d'accueil et de traitement des patients, mais une attention, peut-être insuffisante, a été apportée aux nuisances sonores liées aux équipements de dialyse. Il nous est donc apparu utile de conduire une étude sur les paramètres acoustiques en salle de dialyse, et d'évaluer les effets sur la qualité de vie perçue d'un traitement acoustique destiné à réduire le niveau de bruit ambiant. Après des mesures réalisées en conditions standard, des dispositifs adaptés d'absorption du bruit (panneaux et claustras) ont été installés dans une salle de traitement de 8 postes, accueillant 32 patients volontaires, et leurs effets évalués par un questionnaire de qualité de vie administré à 3 reprises (avant l'installation, au terme d'une semaine, et après le retrait des dispositifs), chaque patient étant son propre témoin. Les mesures du bruit ambiant pendant les périodes de dialyse et une modélisation numérique de la salle ont été effectuées en parallèle afin de rechercher des corrélations entre les modifications subjectives exprimées par les patients et les critères quantitatifs du bruit. Les résultats montrent que de tels dispositifs permettent de réduire significativement la gêne acoustique perçue et leurs conséquences (céphalées), et suggèrent que ces améliorations sont dues à l'homogénéisation fréquentielle du temps de réverbération dans la salle et à la réduction des composantes basses fréquences induites par les différentes sources de bruit identifiées.The impairment of quality of life experienced by patients treated with chronic hemodialysis results from many factors, including the care environment. Current regulations have significantly improved reception and treatment conditions for patients, but perhaps insufficient attention has been paid to the noise nuisance associated with dialysis equipment. We therefore found it useful to conduct a study on acoustic parameters in the dialysis room, and to evaluate the effects on perceived quality of life of an acoustic treatment intended to reduce the level of ambient noise. After measurements carried out under standard conditions, adapted noise absorption (devices panels and trellis) were installed in a treatment room of 8 posts hosting 32 volunteer patients, and their effects evaluated by a quality of life questionnaire administered 3 times (before, at the end of one week, and after the removal of the devices), each patient being his own witness. Measurements of ambient noise during dialysis periods and numerical modeling of the room were performed in parallel in order to search for correlations between the subjective changes expressed by the patients and the quantitative noise criteria. The results show that such devices can significantly reduce the perceived acoustic discomfort and their consequences (headaches), and suggest that these improvements are due to the frequential homogenization of the reverberation time in the room and the reduction of the low frequency components induced by the different sources of noise identified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".