MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2916122026 · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2019.2900844

Output Feedback Model Predictive Control of Interval Type-2 T–S Fuzzy System With Bounded Disturbance

2019· article· en· W2916122026 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Bounded functionModel predictive controlController (irrigation)MathematicsObserver (physics)Fuzzy control systemComputer scienceFuzzy logicMathematical optimizationControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the problem of output feedback model predictive control (MPC) for interval Type-2 Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy systems with bounded disturbance is investigated. The output feedback MPC approach includes an offline design of the state observer to estimate true states and predict bounds of future estimation error sets, and an online problem that optimizes the controller gains to stabilize the closed-loop observer system. The dynamics of the estimation error system is determined by the offline designed observer gain, and bounds of which are online refreshed by scaling a minimal robust positively invariant (RPI) set via a scalar. The optimized controller gains steer the current estimated state from an RPI set into another one such that future estimated states are invariant in the subsequent RPI set. Convergence of the estimation error system and stability condition on the closed-loop observer system in terms of linear matrix inequalities are derived using the technique of S-procedure. The estimation error and estimated state converge within the corresponding time-varying RPI sets, and therefore, recursive feasibility of the optimization problem and input-to-state stability of the closed-loop observer system with respect to the estimation error and bounded disturbance are ensured. For reducing the online computational burden, a lookup table that stores the offline calculated controller gains with corresponding regions of attraction is offline constructed for online searching real-time controller gains. A simulation example is given to show the effectiveness of the approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it