MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2916304525 · doi:10.4236/cus.2019.71002

Development Value and Future Trend of Urban Underground Street

2019· article· en· W2916304525 on OpenAlexaff
Pei Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Urban Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderground infrastructure and sustainability
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsValue (mathematics)Environmental scienceEnvironmental planningCivil engineeringTransport engineeringBusinessEngineeringMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Underground street refers to a street built under a busy business district or a crowding center in a city, providing underground sidewalks for urban residents, opening shops and arranging various service facilities on both sides. Starting with the definition of urban underground street, this paper analyses the origin, classification, composition, development value and future trend of underground street, and holds that reasonable proportion should be maintained in the area of each component of underground street. The main development value of underground street lies in saving land and alleviating traffic pressure. 3D, urban complex, humanistic design and tourist attractions are future development trends of urban underground Street.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score0.800

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Urban StudiesSame topicUnderground infrastructure and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207