MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2916350381 · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2016.07.591

2016 Focused Update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

2016· review· en· W2916350381 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Laurent Macle, John A. Cairns, Kori Leblanc, Teresa S.M. Tsang, Allan C. Skanes, Jafna L. Cox, Jeff S. Healey, Alan Bell, Louise Pilote, Jason G. Andrade, L. Brent Mitchell, Clare Atzema, David J. Gladstone, Mike Sharma, Subodh Verma, Stuart J. Connolly, Paul Dorian, Ratika Parkash, Mario Talajic, Stanley Nattel, Atul Verma

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Cardiology · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalSunnybrook Health Science CentreSouthlake Regional Health CenterAlberta Health ServicesMcGill University Health CentreOntario Stroke NetworkMcMaster UniversityHamilton General HospitalUniversity of TorontoWestern UniversityDalhousie UniversityHealth Sciences CentreLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of British ColumbiaMontreal Heart InstituteQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtrial fibrillationCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyManagement of atrial fibrillationCardiologyInternal medicineIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score0.177

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0090.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations272
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of CardiologySame topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207