Arbitrary-Waveform Electro-Optical Intracranial Neurostimulator With Load-Adaptive High-Voltage Compliance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A hybrid 16-channel current-mode and the 8-channel optical implantable neurostimulating system is presented. The system generates arbitrary-waveform charge-balanced current-mode electrical pulses with an amplitude ranging from 50 μA to 10 mA. An impedance monitoring feedback loop is employed to automatically adjust the supply voltage, yielding a load-optimized power dissipation. The 8-channel optical stimulator drives an array of LEDs, each with a maximum of 25 mA current amplitude, and reuses the arbitrary-waveform generation function of the electrical stimulator. The LEDs are assembled within a custom-made 4 × 4 ECoG grid electrode array, enabling precise optical stimulation of neurons with a 300 μm pitch between the LEDs and simultaneous monitoring of the neural response by the ECoG electrode, at different distances of the stimulation site. The hybrid stimulation system is implemented on a mini-PCB, and receives power and stimulation commands inductively through a second board and a coil stacked on top of it. The entire system is sized at 3 × 2.5 × 1 cm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup> and weighs 7 grams. The system efficacy for electrical and optical stimulation is validated in-vivo using separate chronic and acute experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".