Mother’s Parenting Style and Television Media Access Determining Bullying Behavior on Elementary School Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of maternal parenting style and television media access on bullying behavior of elementary school children. The population in this study were 289 of 5th grade students in two sub-districts of Bogor with an age range of 10-12 years. The entire study sample consisted of 74 students selected using a simple random sampling technique. Data collection was using a questionnaire tool with self-report techniques and in-depth interviews as additional data. Data were processed and analyzed using multiple linear regression tests on the SPSS program. The results showed that less than half of mothers tend to have authoritative parenting styles. Children's access to television media is classified as the high category, which can be seen from the length of duration and the high frequency of watching television and the type of content that children watch is exposed to violence and not suitable to their age. Besides, bullying behavior that most children do is verbal bullying. The analysis results found that the mother's authoritarian parenting style and the high access of children using television media had a significant positive effect on the bullying behavior of elementary school children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".