MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2916393049 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2018.8647807

Energy Efficient Hybrid Precoding in Heterogeneous Networks with Limited Wireless Backhaul Capacity

2018· article· en· W2916393049 on OpenAlexaff
Zheng Chu, Wanming Hao, Pei Xiao, Fuhui Zhou, De Mi, Zhengyu Zhu, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBackhaul (telecommunications)Mathematical optimizationPrecodingIterative methodOrthogonal frequency-division multiple accessSubgradient methodFractional programmingBase stationZero-forcing precodingTransmitter power outputInteger programmingResource allocationEfficient energy useOptimization problemMIMONonlinear programmingOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingBeamformingComputer networkAlgorithmEngineeringMathematicsNonlinear systemTelecommunicationsTransmitter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates a two-tier heterogeneous networks (HetNets), where millimeter wave (mmWave) frequency is employed at the macro base station (MBS), and the small cell BSs (SBSs) consider orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA). Subarray structure based hybrid analog/digital precoding scheme is studied to reduce the hardware cost and energy consumption. Our goal is to maximize the energy efficiency (EE) of the HetNets with limited wireless backhaul capacity and all users' quality of service (QoS) constraints. Due to nonconvexity of the mixed integer nonlinear fraction programming (MINLFP), the formulated problem cannot be solved directly. In order to circumvent this issue, we propose a two-loop iterative resource allocation algorithm. Specifically, we reformulate the outer-loop problem into a difference of convex programming (DCP) by employing integer relaxation and Dinkelback method. In addition, the first-order approximation is adopted to linearize this inner-loop DCP problem into a convex optimization framework. Lagrange dual method is adapted to achieve the optimal power allocation. Furthermore, the convergence of the proposed iterative algorithm is analyzed. Numerical results are presented to demonstrate our proposed algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.488
Threshold uncertainty score0.577

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingFrench-language works237,207