MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2916405216 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.08069

With Great Speed Come Small Buffers: Space-Bandwidth Tradeoffs for Routing

2019· preprint· en· W2916405216 on OpenAlexaff
Avery Miller, Boaz Patt-Shamir, Will Rosenbaum

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Search Problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombinatoricsPath (computing)Space (punctuation)BurstinessSigmaOmegaNetwork packetComputer scienceQueueing theoryMathematicsDiscrete mathematicsAlgorithmComputer networkPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the Adversarial Queuing Theory (AQT) model, where packet arrivals are subject to a maximum average rate $0\leρ\le1$ and burstiness $σ\ge0$. In this model, we analyze the size of buffers required to avoid overflows in the basic case of a path. Our main results characterize the space required by the average rate and the number of distinct destinations: we show that $O(k d^{1/k})$ space suffice, where $d$ is the number of distinct destinations and $k=\lfloor 1/ρ\rfloor$; and we show that $Ω(\frac 1 k d^{1/k})$ space is necessary. For directed trees, we describe an algorithm whose buffer space requirement is at most $1 + d' + σ$ where $d'$ is the maximum number of destinations on any root-leaf path.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.086 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicOptimization and Search ProblemsFrench-language works237,207