MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2916425158 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2018.8647443

Enabling Adaptive Data Prefetching in 5G Mobile Networks with Edge Caching

2018· article· en· W2916425158 on OpenAlexaff
Chengchao Liang, F. Richard Yu, Ngọc Dũng Đào, Gamini Senarath, Hamid Farmanbar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)Carleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionComputer networkEdge deviceOperating systemTelecommunicationsCloud computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The exponential growth of data traffic volume dominates the demand for the next generation mobile networks (5G). The consistent and satisfied quality of experience (QoE) is one of the leading challenges of provisioning services in 5G mobile networks. Thus, in this paper, we propose a novel adaptive prefetching scheme to compensate the undesired transmission conditions in the 5G mobile network by extending the content prefetching concept from the users to the network. Specifically, an optimization problem is proposed for a prefetching scheme that adaptively retrieves users' data to access nodes and (or) user equipments (UEs) before the actual requests according to the network status, QoE status, predicted data rates, and mobility patterns of users. For the sake of tractability, the prefetching problem is transferred to a convex problem that can be solved efficiently. Accordingly, to implement the proposed schemes in the 5G network, system interactions among entities in the network are designed to realize prefetching-related functions. A signaling protocol to support the adaptive prefetching scheme is also presented. Simulation results show that an adaptive prefetching scheme can improve the network performance significantly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207