MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2916441259 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2018.8647178

Reinforcement Learning-Based Computing and Transmission Scheduling for LTE-U-Enabled IoT

2018· article· en· W2916441259 on OpenAlexaff
Hongli He, Hangguan Shan, Aiping Huang, Qiang Ye, Weihua Zhuang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningComputer scienceComputer networkBase stationQuality of serviceScheduling (production processes)Q-learningSoftware deploymentLyapunov optimizationDistributed computingWirelessOptimization problemSpectrum managementArtificial intelligenceCognitive radioMathematical optimizationTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To facilitate the private deployment of industrial Internet-of-Things (IoT), applying LTE in unlicensed spectrum (LTE-U) is a promising approach, which both tackles the problem of lacking licensed spectrum and leverages an LTE protocol to meet stringent quality-of- service (QoS) requirements via centralized control. In this paper, we investigate the computing offloading problem in an LTE-U-enabled network, where the task on an IoT device is carried out either locally or is offloaded to the LTE-U base station (BS). The offloading policy is formulated as an optimization problem to maximize the long term discounted reward, considering both task completion profit and the task completion delay. Due to the stochastic task arrival process at each device and the Wi-Fi's contention-based random access, we reformulate the computing offloading problem into a Q-learning problem and solve it by a deep learning network-based approximation method. Simulation results show that the proposed scheme considerably enhances the system performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207