MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

VITENTI, Livia. 2016. Los pueblos indígenas americanos y la práctica del suicidio: una reseña crítica. Buenos Aires : Prometeo Libros

2017· article· es· W2916500286 on OpenAlex
Mônica Thereza Soares Pechincha

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Education, Indigenous Social Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A antropóloga brasileira Livia Vitenti realizou pesquisa etnográfica acerca do suicídio entre os Atikamekw de Manawan, no Canadá, da qual resultou sua tese de doutoramento pela Universidade de Montreal. Com o presente livro, a autora oferece mais uma contribuição ao ainda exíguo campo de produção antropológica sobre o assunto. O livro não é uma releitura de sua tese: como indica o título, sua intenção é apresentar recensões críticas de enfoques diversos sobre o problema do suicídio. Já o recorte geográfico, o do continente americano, é conformado pelo exame de estudos de caso, não só da antropologia, entre coletivos indígenas no Canadá, no Brasil, na Colômbia, no Peru e na Argentina.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.008
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it