MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2916515866 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2018.8648029

Joint VNF Placement and Multicast Traffic Routing in 5G Core Networks

2018· article· en· W2916515866 on OpenAlexaff
Omar Alhussein, Phu Thinh, Junling Li, Qiang Ye, Weisen Shi, Weihua Zhuang, Xuemin Shen, Xu Li, Jaya Rao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)University of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkVirtual networkDistributed computingMulticastSoftware-defined networkingMultipath routingProvisioningRouting (electronic design automation)Static routingRouting protocol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The software defined networking (SDN) enabled network function virtualization (NFV) architecture emerges as a cost-effective solution for service customization in fifth generation (5G) networks. In this paper, a joint traffic routing and virtual network function (VNF) placement problem is studied for a multicast service request accommodated over a physical substrate network, where the multipath traffic routing is considered between embedded VNFs. The joint problem is formulated as a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) problem to minimize the provisioning cost of both VNFs and links, under the physical network resource constraints, flow conservation constraints, and VNF placement rules. Since the problem is NP-hard, low complexity heuristic algorithms, with the consideration of both the single-path and multipath routing cases, are proposed to determine an efficient solution. Simulation results are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed heuristic algorithms especially for a large-size network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207