MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2916555027 · doi:10.1021/cen-09707-acsnews2

<i>ACS Materials Letters</i> launches

2019· article· en· W2916555027 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Linda Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueC&EN Global Enterprise · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicInnovation Policy and R&D
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Materials ResearchCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The American Chemical Society is adding a new publication, ACS Materials Letters, to its suite of journals, bringing the total number of ACS journals to 60. Submissions are being accepted, and the first articles will appear online in late spring or early summer. ACS Materials Letters, led by inaugural deputy editor Bin Liu, Provost’s Chair Professor and head of the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the National University of Singapore, will highlight fundamental and applied research at the interface between materials and other disciplines, including chemistry, engineering, and biology. “I am honored to be named the inaugural deputy editor of ACS Materials Letters. It is a recognition of Asia’s materials community. The role is also very important to me in a personal way, as I see it as an acknowledgment of the materials research work ongoing in my home country of Singapore,” Liu says. “I envision ACS Materials

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueC&EN Global EnterpriseSame topicInnovation Policy and R&DFrench-language works237,207