MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2916583009 · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2011.03.015

The 2011 Canadian Hypertension Education Program Recommendations for the Management of Hypertension: Blood Pressure Measurement, Diagnosis, Assessment of Risk, and Therapy

2011· article· en· W2916583009 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Doreen M. Rabi, Stella S. Daskalopoulou, Raj Padwal, Nadia Khan, Steven A. Grover, Daniel G. Hackam, Martin G. Myers, Donald W. McKay, Robert R. Quinn, Brenda R. Hemmelgarn, Lyne Cloutier, Peter Bolli, Michael D. Hill, Thomas W. Wilson, Brian Penner, Ellen Burgess, Maxime Lamarre-Cliché, Donna McLean, Ernesto L. Schiffrin, George Honos, Karen Mann, Guy Tremblay, Alain Milot, Arun Chockalingam, Simon W. Rabkin, Martin Dawes, Rhian M. Touyz, Kevin D. Burns, Marcel Ruzicka, Norman R.C. Campbell, Michel Vallée, G. V. Ramesh Prasad, Marcel Lebel, Tavis S. Campbell, M. Patrice Lindsay, Robert J. Herman, Pierre Larochelle, Ross D. Feldman, J. Malcolm O. Arnold, Gordon W. Moe, Jonathan G. Howlett, Luc Trudeau, Simon Bacon, Robert J. Petrella, Richard Lewanczuk, James A. Stone, Denis Drouin, Jean-Martin Boulanger, Mukul Sharma, Pavel Hamet, George Fodor, George K. Dresser, S. George Carruthers, George Pylypchuk, Richard E. Gilbert, Lawrence A. Leiter, Charlotte Jones, Richard I. Ogilvie, Vincent Woo, Philip A. McFarlane, Robert A. Hegele, Luc Poirier, Sheldon W. Tobe

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Cardiology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecSt. Michael's HospitalLawson Health Research InstituteConcordia UniversityUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontUniversité LavalUniversity of OttawaDalhousie UniversityOntario Stroke NetworkQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreUniversity of SaskatchewanHôpital du Saint-SacrementCanadian Sleep SocietyUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversity of TorontoMemorial University of NewfoundlandHôpital Charles-Le MoyneSimon Fraser UniversityMontreal General HospitalJewish General HospitalSunnybrook Health Science CentreOttawa HospitalHôtel-Dieu de QuébecUniversity of CalgaryHealth Sciences CentreSt. Paul's HospitalWestern UniversityUniversity of ManitobaMontreal Clinical Research InstituteUniversity of British ColumbiaLondon Health Sciences CentreMcGill UniversityUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Alberta
FundersDivision of ChemistryCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchPfizerHeart and Stroke Foundation of CanadaPfizer CanadaNovo NordiskSanofiGlaxoSmithKlineServierAmgenAstraZenecaEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsMedicineGuidelineTelmisartanDiabetes mellitusBlood pressureInternal medicineMasked HypertensionIntensive care medicineDiureticThiazideStroke (engine)Ambulatory blood pressureEndocrinologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.046
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.046
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0090.019
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations150
Published2011
Admission routes4
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of CardiologySame topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesFrench-language works237,207