MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2916634237 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-116599

Long Term AML Survivors Have Increased Mortality and High Prevalence of Clonal Hematopoiesis

2018· article· en· W2916634237 on OpenAlexaff
Noa Chapal Ilani, Elisabeth Niemeyer, Netta Mendelson Cohen, Yoni Moskovitz, Barak Oron, Amanda Mitchell, Mark D. Minden, Amos Tanay, Ran D. Balicer, Tamir Biezuner, Daniela Cilloni, Klaus H. Metzeler, Yishai Ofran, Nathali Kaushansky, Liran I. Shlush

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineMyeloid leukemiaCohortDiseaseLeukemiaPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a devastating disease; however 20%-30% of patients will achieve long term remission. The long-term follow up of AML patients who received bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is well documented. It remains unclear though whether AML long-term survivors who did not undergo BMT (LTSnoBMT) return to normal health. In order to answer this question a large cohort of AML patients and well matched controls are needed. For the present study, the electronic health records (EHR) of 4.2 million individuals covering over 16 years of follow up were studied. Morbidity and mortality of LTSnoBMT were compared to a large number of age-matched controls. We identified 177 LTS who were in remission two years after AML diagnosis of which 61 were LTSnoBMT. The mortality of LTSnoBMT 10 years after diagnosis was 20%-50% higher in comparison to controls in an age dependent manner with higher mortality among the elderly LTS (Figure 1A, B). While several lab results were different between the LTSnoBMT and controls, most strikingly the red cell distribution width (RDW) of the LTSnoBMT was much higher among elderly LTSnoBMT (Figure 1C). High RDW has been previously reported to correlate with mortality. Recent studies found that high RDW predict AML and even greater correlation of high RDW with mortality among individuals carrying age related clonal hematopoiesis (ARCH) mutations was detected. To investigate the genetic profile of LTSnoBMT, a deep-targeted sequencing method (covering 32 recurrently mutated genes in AML) was used. Remission samples (at least 2 years from diagnosis) from 28 LTSnoBMT were analyzed. In most cases mutations which were detected at diagnosis, were not present in the remission samples. ARCH defining events (most of them new) were found in 64% of the LTSnoBMT. To evaluate whether this high prevalence of ARCH related mutations among LTSnoBMT patients is related to chemotherapy exposure, we also studied 30 individuals with lymphoid malignancies who received chemotherapy and were in remission. The prevalence of ARCH related mutations in the controls was significantly lower (37%) than in the LTSnoBMT (Figure 2A) (p=0.035). Higher prevalence of IDH1/2 mutations was found among LTSnoBMT (Figure 2C) (p=0.017). Furthermore, 70% of the mutations detected in the LTSnoBMT were recurrent (i.e. has more than 5 occurrences in COSMIC data base) compared to 31% in the controls (Figure 2B) (p=0.001). Altogether, AML is a complex disease where even after the sustainable eradication of the malignant clone, the hematopoietic system/microenvironment does not normalize. The reported correlation between ARCH and mortality suggests that the high prevalence of ARCH related mutations among LTS might contribute to the high mortality that we observed. Our findings have both biological and clinical implications. Future studies should determine the reasons why AML - LTS have such high prevalence of ARCH with specific mutations and increased mortality. Furthermore, closer clinical follow up including mutation analysis should be considered for these individuals. Disclosures Cilloni: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Metzeler:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Ofran:Novartis: Other: Served on a Novartis advisory board.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→French-language works237,207→