Primal column generation framework for vehicle and crew scheduling problems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The primal adjacency‐based algorithm and the multidirectional dynamic programming algorithm are two exact methods that have recently been developed to efficiently solve the shortest path problem with resource constraints (SPPRCs). These methods are primal in the sense that they are able to produce sequences of feasible solutions using iterative exploration of the search space. Since the SPPRCs often appear as a subproblem (SP) in the solution of vehicle and crew scheduling problems (VCSP) using column generation (CG), we propose a new primal column generation framework that embeds these primal methods in a CG scheme. The primal column generation solves at each iteration a sequence of appropriate restricted SP and stops solving the SP when there is no need to continue. This approach introduces a large degree of flexibility, and allows performing good cost improvements in a very limited time. Computational experiments on VCSP instances show that the proposed approach is able to find optimal solutions while reducing the time spent solving the SP by factors of up to seven compared to the standard CG algorithm. This leads to significant improvements in the overall solution times, with an average reduction factor of 3.5.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".