The Ottawa Field-Naturalists' Club Awards for 2008
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On 25 April 2009, members and friends of the Ottawa Field-Naturalists' Club (OFNC) gathered at the Club's annual Soirée at St. Basil's Church in Ottawa, and once again, awards were given to members and one nonmember who distinguished themselves by accomplishments in the field of natural history and conservation or by extraordinary activity within the Club.Careful observation of plants and animals, political savvy, selfless service, and teaching skills are all in evidence among the 2008 winners.The following citations for those who received an award were read to the members and guests assembled for the event. Christine Hanrahan -Honorary MemberThis award is presented in recognition of outstanding contributions by a member or non-member to Canadian natural history or to the successful operation of the Club.Usually people awarded an honorary membership have made extensive contributions over many years.Christine Hanrahan could be receiving this award to honour over two decades' worth of dedicated investigation and documentation of the flora and fauna in natural areas in Ontario and British Columbia or for countless hours of footslogging on
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".