Methadone dosing strategies in preterm neonates can be simplified
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: A dramatic increase in newborn infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome has been observed and these neonates are frequently treated with complex methadone dosing schemes to control their withdrawal symptoms. Despite its abundant use, hardly any data on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of methadone is available in preterm neonates. Therefore we investigated developmental PK of methadone and evaluated current dosing strategies and possible simplification in this vulnerable population. METHODS: A single-centre open-label prospective study was performed to collect PK data after a single oral dose of methadone in preterm neonates. A population PK model was built to characterize developmental PK of (R)- and (S)-methadone. Model-based simulations were performed to identify a simplified dosing strategy to reach and maintain target methadone exposure. RESULTS: A total of 121 methadone concentrations were collected from 31 preterm neonates. A one-compartment model with first order absorption and elimination kinetics best described PK data for (R)- and (S)-methadone. Clearance increases with advancing gestational age and differs between R- and S-enantiomer, being slightly higher for the former (0.244 vs 0.167 L/h). Preterm neonates reached target exposure after 48 hours with currently used dosing schedules. Output from simulations revealed that target exposures can be achieved with a simplified dosing strategy during the first 4 days of treatment. CONCLUSION: Methadone clearance in preterm neonates increases with advancing gestational age and its disposition is influenced by its chirality. Simulations that account for developmental PK changes indicate a shorter methadone dosing strategy can maintain target exposure to control withdrawal symptoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".