Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae ve Mycoplasma hyorhinis’in Aynı Anda Tespitinde Gerçek Zamanlı, Dubleks PCR Metodunun Uygulanması
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to develop a TaqMan probe-based, sensitive, specific duplex real-time PCR assay for simultaneous detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Mycoplasma hyorhinis. The specific primers and probes, labeled with FAM and Texas Red, respectively, were designed to amplify the p97 gene of M. hyopneumoniae and p37gene of M. hyorhinis. The duplex real-time PCR reaction mixtures were established and optimized and the sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility of the assay were assessed. The sensitivity of the duplex real-time PCR was found to be 10 copies/L for both M. hyopneumoniae and M. hyorhinis, respectively. There was no cross reaction with other common viral and bacterial pathogens. The concentration of standard coefficient of variation of Ct values was less than 5%, indicating a good reproducibility. Clinical samples (n = 937) were tested by the duplex real-time PCR assay, including broncho-alveolar lavage fluids, nasal swabs, tissues and cell culture supernatant. Duplex real-time PCR for simultaneous detection of M. hyopneumoniae and M. hyorhinis was highly sensitive and can be utilized for diagnosing clinical samples. It is timeefficient and economic, thereby providing a new approach to control both M. hyopneumoniae and M. hyorhinis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".