MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2916836673 · doi:10.1542/pir.22-7-227

Preparticipation Examination of the Adolescent Athlete: Part 2

2001· review· en· W2916836673 on OpenAlexaff
Jordan D. Metzl

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatrics in Review · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Canadian institutionsAthletic Edge Sports Medicine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAthletesPhysical examinationPhysical therapySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Jordan D. Metzl, MD* 1. 2. *Medical Director, The Sports Medicine Institute for Young Athletes; Assistant Attending Physician, Sports Medicine Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY. Objectives After completing this article, readers should be able to: 1. Perform a sport-specific medical and musculoskeletal examination. 2. Explain why it is important to define pre-existing injury patterns. 3. Characterize preventive conditioning and rehabilitation programs for young athletes. This is the second of two articles dedicated to the preparticipation examination of the adolescent athlete. The first article addressed the medical and family history, and this article discusses the medical and orthopedic portions of the examination. The medical examination portion of the preparticipation examination (PPE) should serve both as a follow-up for concerns raised in the medical and family history portion of the examination and as a screening for any medical conditions that might limit safe sports participation. The medical examination begins with measurement of the vital signs, height, weight, blood pressure, heart rate, pulse, and respiratory rate. Blood pressure in the adolescent patient is an important marker for the presence of underlying, silent pathology, including primary hypertension or hypertension due to renal, endocrinologic, cardiac, or central nervous system causes. Secondary hypertension also can result from anabolic steroid use. Blood pressure should be measured with the bladder encircling at least two thirds of the arm. The most common cause for an abnormal value is improper cuff sizing. If the initial value is elevated, two subsequent readings should be obtained before diagnosing hypertension. The guidelines regarding adolescent hypertension are listed in the Table⇓ . Of note, grade III hypertension requires removal from athletics until control is achieved, and grade IV hypertension is a contraindication to sports participation. View this table: Table 1. Values for Adolescent Hypertension Once vital signs are established, the general medical examination should focus on sports-readiness. General markers for health are important, particularly excessive thinness or obesity and phenotypic manifestations of multisystem illnesses such as Marfan syndrome. Contagious skin conditions, including impetigo, molluscum contagiosum, and …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score0.853

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatrics in ReviewSame topicCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseFrench-language works237,207