MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2916882902 · doi:10.1525/jsah.2019.78.1.117

Review: <i>Modern Coliseum: Stadiums and American Culture</i>, by Benjamin D. Lisle and <i>Architecture on Ice: A History of the Hockey Arena</i>, by Howard Shubert

2019· article· en· W2916882902 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Benjamin S. Flowers

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Society of Architectural Historians · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Science and Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconCitationArchitectureArt historyHistoryMedia studiesLibrary scienceArtSociologyComputer scienceVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Review| March 01 2019 Review: Modern Coliseum: Stadiums and American Culture, by Benjamin D. Lisle and Architecture on Ice: A History of the Hockey Arena, by Howard Shubert Benjamin D. LisleModern Coliseum: Stadiums and American CulturePhiladelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017, 328 pp., 76 b/w illus. $34.95 (cloth), ISBN 9780812249224Howard ShubertArchitecture on Ice: A History of the Hockey ArenaMontreal: McGill-Queens University Press, 2016, 328 pp., 160 color illus. $49.95 (cloth), ISBN 9780773548138 Benjamin Flowers Benjamin Flowers Georgia Institute of Technology Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians (2019) 78 (1): 117–119. https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2019.78.1.117 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Benjamin Flowers; Review: Modern Coliseum: Stadiums and American Culture, by Benjamin D. Lisle and Architecture on Ice: A History of the Hockey Arena, by Howard Shubert. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 1 March 2019; 78 (1): 117–119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2019.78.1.117 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of the Society of Architectural Historians Search Over the past two decades, the stadium as a building type has undergone a profound transformation. For most of the twentieth century, it was the preserve of builders and engineers far more than of architects. Indeed, the most prolific designer of stadia, not just in those years but perhaps ever, Archibald Leitch, was trained, depending on your historical research, as either a mechanical engineer or a “factory architect.”1 In the past century, the stadium generally was regarded as a project of modest architectural but specific commercial ambitions (with some rare, but notable, exceptions). Much has changed recently, owing to circumstances largely exogenous to design per se but central to the powerhouse role that sports play in the economies of cities around the world. In our present moment, a stadium is likely the single largest, most technologically complex, and, perhaps most important, expensive building in any given city. In addition... You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.849

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Society of Architectural HistoriansSame topicHistory of Science and MedicineFrench-language works237,207